Evangelical group Christian Voice expressed outrage at the work, calling it blasphemous and saying it had created a “storm” of protest.
I wonder. Is it conceivably the case that this “storm” of protest might (a) be more akin to a breeze in its proportions, and (b) have been created by Christian Voice rather than the statue itself? Christian Voice appears to be something of a roving storm in search of an unholy teacup: its recent press releases decry this statue (twice), the proposal to scrap the blasphemy law, and ‘Jerry Springer: The Opera’.
Its director, Stephen Green, said:
It's just so disgusting, pornographic and offensive, it's hard to find words to express the outrage.
He then found many, many more words to express his outrage, with particular reference to the facts that the artist who created the sculpture is Chinese and the collector who has bought it is Jewish.
I have written asking for the statue's destruction.
Not asking for it to be removed from display. Not asking for any display to be in a separate room with a warning on the door. But “destruction”. That’s his answer to thought-crime. Sigh…
It doesn’t look a particularly impressive sculpture, and it’s a bit on the puerile side for my liking. But my response will be just not to go and see it.
As to its blasphemous nature – isn’t it part of the doctrine of the incarnation that Jesus was both fully divine and, ahem, all man?
(Hat tip: the Barefoot Bum.)
(Footnote: you might think that two posts about genitals in one day is a bit much. I prefer to think of them as two posts about arrogant stupidity.)